The central part of medicine is patients - don't push them out of social media

Clinical medicine is disappearing fast as topic for blog posts

Something happened to medical blogs in the past 6-12 months. They now seem a lot less interesting, more industrialized and aggregated. They have also become "too safe", generic and detached for regular reading.

There seems to be a rise of group blogs, guest posts and semi-syndicated contents. Several "clinic-focused" health bloggers have retired due to a variety of professional and HIPAA-related concerns.

It looks like clinical medicine is disappearing fast as a topic for blog posts in the U.S., replaced by posts about social media itself. As a side note, "social media" is actually a plural noun (media vs. medium), but it seems to be used mostly in singular form nowadays.

The central part of medicine is patients - don't push them out of social media

The central part of medicine is patients. Yet, we tell doctors: "never, ever blog about patients". This somewhat misguided advice displaces the most important part of the equation - the patients themselves.

Some health bloggers claim that we have to "aim above HIPAA" to avoid privacy breaches and comply with the highest standard of professionalism required by our occupation as physicians. How high "above HIPAA" is good enough though? In most clinical scenarios, the compliance with omitting the 18 unique HIPAA identifiers strikes the right balance.

Physicians must maintain appropriate boundaries of the patient-physician relationship in accordance with professional ethical guidelines just, as they would in any other context. When physicians see content posted by colleagues that appears unprofessional they have a responsibility to bring that content first to the attention of the individual, so that he or she can remove it and/or take other appropriate actions. If the behavior significantly violates professional norms and the individual does not take appropriate action to resolve the situation, the physician should report the matter to appropriate authorities (Source: AMA Policy: Professionalism in the Use of Social Media, 2011; my edits are in bold in the text above).

Different standards for individual doctors vs. health system conglomerates

There seems to be a discrepancy of the methods employed by doctors and institutions when using social media. We tell doctors: "never answer patient questions on Twitter". Yet, Cleveland Clinic runs regular Twitter chats soliciting patient questions which are then answered by doctors and healthcare personnel. Mayo Clinic and other institutions do the same.

A blog is your notebook for lifelong learning

Don't forget the most important thing: A blog is your notebook for lifelong learning. Doctors learn from their patients every day. Patients learn from their doctors every day too. Both groups must try their best to excel in the joint quest to achieve the best possible outcome.

Comments from Twitter

@scanman (Vijay): 3 doctors, @kmathan @razmohan & I, set up a twitter account @DrTamil to answer medical queries from Tamil tweeters.

@DrVes: You know the comment that you are going to get, right? "It will never happen here."

@DrVes: New trend: Hospitals tell doctors-in-training point-blank during orientation: "Don't blog. Don't tweet." Consequently, interns close blogs and Twitter accounts (confirmed via email from a trainee).

@macobgyn (MacArthur Obgyn) why do you think that is?

@SarahStewart (SarahStewart): I wonder if medical blogs are reacting to fear of litigation etc.

@DrVes: I'm sure they are. The community itself is not making things easier either.

@Skepticscalpel (Skeptical Scalpel): You're reading the wrong blogs. Try mine http://skepticalscalpel.blogspot.com

@CardioNP (Cardio NP): mirroring medicine in general? Agree w you re blogs; miss the early years ~2004-5. Agree skeptic that ur blog is a nice welcome addition

@marciovm (marcio von muhlen): will change as social media permeates society, informed consent will be feasible re: sharing medical info. Difficult to explain now.

@scanman (Vijay) This tweet - http://bit.ly/mpPL0P - by @DrVes, one of the most consistent medical bloggers, was meant for the Social Media Moral Police.

@vincristine (Vincristine): Who is 'we'? I imagine doctors will tweet what, where and how they choose to tweet, no matter what 'we' say

@laikas Laika (Jacqueline): A lot of interesting observations by @DrVes on the evolvement of medical blogs & social media use. I will take up my #FF habit #ff @DrVes

References

“The powers of medicines and the practice of healing - to exercise the quiet art” - Virgil, Aeneid http://goo.gl/5BUb3

The making of a modern physician - The Lancet http://goo.gl/SYfTu

Strictly speaking, “Doctor” is a word incorrectly applied to most medical practitioners http://goo.gl/wjA0S

Despite the dire warnings, use of social media among emergency physicians is unusually strong http://goo.gl/QlqnK

AMA Policy: Professionalism in the Use of Social Media, 2011.
Image source: Wikipedia, GNU Free Documentation License.

Related reading

Why I became an oncologist - by the president of the American Society of Clinical Oncologists - a patient defined his professional life. CNN, 2011.

Patients can teach us so much. We must pay attention. And yet some people want to silence their voice on blogs and Twitter.
Keeping all regulations in mind, a medical student soon finds there is nothing to blog about: http://goo.gl/541pj
HIPAA found in Hippocratic Oath: Keep the patients’ secrets a secret. Also: My colleagues will be my brothers and sisters http://bit.ly/pGObLI

Disclaimer

I am the Editor-in-Chief of several case-based curricula of medicine and related specialties. This is the information regarding patient data: There is no real life patient data on this website. Please note: we do not write or “blog” about patients. All case descriptions are fictional, similar to the descriptions you can find in a multiple choice questions textbook for board exam preparation. Case courses and descriptions do not follow real cases.